On 14 October 2024, the EUIPO Grand Board of Appeals issued its decision in the Nightwatch case, for which our dedicated ECTA Amicus Curiae Task Force prepared and filed a brief in June 2024.

In essence the Grand Board, following a request by the EUIPO Executive Director, had to decide whether EUIPO’s current practice on conversion is legally correct. The Grand Board, after reviewing the case law and the Amicus Curiae briefs filed by ECTA and by other associations, decided it is not.

The Grand Board held that «there is no legal basis for requiring the EUTM applicant to file an appeal against the refusal decision (or any subsequent dismissal of the appeal) before submitting the conversion request» (at §134). Therefore, in the Grand Board view, conversion cannot be excluded on the basis of a decision refusing the EUTM application in ex parte or inter partes proceedings where the application is subsequently withdrawn before the refusal could take effect. Furthermore, where conversion is requested subsequent to a withdrawal of the EUTM application (Article 139(5) EUTMR), article 139(2)(b) EUTMR - which prevents conversion - does not apply.

Therefore, EUIPO current practice embodied in the EUIPO Guidelines at Part E, Register Operations, Section 2 Conversion, Paragraph 4 will have to be amended.

---

We wish to extend our gratitude to the ECTA Amicus Curiae Task Force for their dedicated efforts in compiling the recommendations for the Grand Board and for reaching this significant milestone in the history of our association.